In the latest sign that absolutely nothing makes sense anymore, WeWork filed formal regulatory paperwork with the Securities and Exchange Commission last week, officially notifying the world that it will soon be going public.
If you havenโt heard of WeWork (or itโs parent– โThe We Companyโ), itโs a real estate company that owns practically zero real estate.
Instead, they lease vast amounts of office space in commercial buildings on long-term contracts, and then sub-lease that space to individual tenants– often small businesses– with short-term contracts.
Itโs essentially the same business model as Regus– which provides virtual office services, business addresses, and short-term office space, in pretty much every major city around the world.
Yet Regus is actually profitable. Its parent company, UK-based International Workspace Group, reported a profit of nearly 300 million British pounds (about $350 million USD) for the first six months of 2019. And the company consistently makes money.
WeWork, on the other hand, consistently burns cash and has no expectation of making money โin the foreseeable futureโ according to its own SEC filing.
In fact, WeWork lost almost $1 billion in the first six months of 2019, putting it on pace to lose even more money than the $1.9 billion it lost in 2018.
WeWork currently has around 10 million square feet of office space, and hopes to grow to 40 million in total.
But Regus already has nearly 60 million square feet of office space worldwide. And itโs still expanding.
So Regus is MUCH larger and turns a healthy profit. WeWork is smaller and loses tons of money.
Youโd think that Regus would be a much more valuable company. But no. Regus is valued at less than $5 billion. While WeWork is going public at a valuation of nearly $50 billion– ten times higher.
Much of this excess is due to WeWorkโs legendary silver-tongued and messianic co-founder/CEO, Adam Neumann.
Neumann has actually been able to convince people that WeWork is a technology company, as a way to justify its absurdly high valuations.
In addition to extolling their โculture of inclusivityโ and โenergy of an inspired communityโ, the companyโs SEC filing refers to their โextensive technologyโ more than 120 times.
Of course, thereโs never any description of the technology, or what it actually does.
Thereโs also not a SINGLE line item in WeWorkโs financial statements that shows ANY research and development.
For technology companies, this is ALWAYS an important item in their financials.
Google spent $16 BILLION on research & development last year, amounting to roughly 14% of its revenue. Amazon spent $22 billion, 12% of its revenue. Facebook spent $7.8 billion, nearly 20% of its revenue.
And even stodgy old Johnson & Johnson, which doesnโt even pretend to be a tech company, spent more than $10 billion (13.8% of revenue) on research & development in 2018.
WeWork claims to be a tech company, even though all they really have is a reservation system that is slightly less impressive than what Enterprise Rent-a-Car uses.
They keep saying how important technology is to their business (as if technology isnโt important to EVERY business in 2019. Duh.)
But WeWork doesnโt even invest enough money in R&D to register a single footnote in their financial statements.
This proves, beyond all doubt, that itโs just a big, giant farce.
The biggest farce of all, though, is WeWorkโs mission to โelevate the worldโs consciousness.โ Thatโs straight out of the companyโs SEC filing.
Jeez I thought this was supposed to be a real estate company.
This reminds me of when Snapchat went public a few years ago; investors thought Snapchat was a sexting social media app for pedophiles teenagers.
But according to its own SEC filing, Snapchat claimed to be a camera companyโฆ which was incredibly bewildering to investors.
WeWork has totally blown Snapchat away on the absurdity scale with this nonsense about consciousness.
What does that even mean?
Business is about focusing capital, energy, and brainpower to achieve specific, tangible outcomes that support a coherent strategy.
Youโre supposed to be able to measure those outcomesโฆ otherwise itโs impossible to tell whether or not management is properly executing the plan.
How exactly does one measure โglobal consciousnessโ? How do you know if your plan to elevate said consciousness is working?
And most importantly, how are you supposed to make money elevating consciousness? Because that doesnโt strike me as an especially profitable venture.
But thatโs exactly the point. Weโre living in a world now where profits donโt matter.
I meanโฆ thereโs more than $10 TRILLION worth of bonds in the world with negative yields. Banks are even loaning money to borrowers at negative interest rates.
And some of the most popular (and expensive) investments in the world lose billions of dollars each year with no end in sight.
You donโt need a PhD in economics to realize that thereโs something wrong with this picture.