Let’s play a game. I’ll give you some recent headlines, and you guess the well-known magazine.
- Here’s What the ‘Manosphere’ Gets Wrong about Cuckoldry
- How a Zombie Law Could Ban Abortion Nationwide If Trump Is Reelected
- Meet the New Autocrats Who Dismantle Democracies from Within
- Finding Math’s Beauty and Power with Drag Queen Kyne Santos
Where do you think these come from? If you guessed Teen Vogue, or even Newsweek, it would be understandable. But incorrect.
No. These headlines are from one of the premier “science” publications in the Land of the Free— Scientific American. And we didn’t even have to comb through years of articles to cherry pick those few. In fact everything we listed above was just from the last few weeks.
This is why it’s so hilarious that Scientific American endorsed Kamala Harris last week; they wrote “Vote for Kamala Harris to Support Science, Health and the Environment.”
So the publication which thinks sex fetishes, abortion, drag queens, and left wing political ideology count as “science” believe that Kamala is the pro-science candidate. Hilarious.
Even the few articles that are actually about real science have a woke, leftist bend. For example, one article is “Florida Surgeon General Spreads COVID Misinformation in Booster Guidelines.”
They go on to slam the state’s top public health official for telling people that new COVID boosters have not been widely tested on humans. So Scientific American decided that he is spreading misinformation… even though (quite bizarrely) they acknowledge in the very same article that the boosters have not, in fact, been widely tested on humans.
It’s especially ironic because one of the only other articles dealing with science is a story about a heroic scientist from the FDA who stood up against the “consensus” among the medical community in the 1960s.
Back then, all the “experts” believed that an untested drug called thalidomide was safe. This one woman questioned the science. And she was right— thalidomide caused monstrous birth defects when it was administered to pregnant women.
So, according to Scientific American, a woman who raised awareness about an untested drug is considered heroic. But Florida’s Surgeon General who is raising awareness about untested booster shots is spreading misinformation.
This double standard appears completely lost on them.
And speaking of double standards among leftist buffoons, the greatest investor of all time scored another big win recently.
Forget Warren Buffet. I’m talking about Paul Pelosi (husband of the former House Speaker and current Congresswoman from San Francisco, Nancy Pelosi) whose track record is virtually unbeatable.
This guy just has a special knack to sniff out amazing investments.
For example, Mr. Pelosi famously purchased very high-risk call options in Microsoft back in 2021; less than two weeks later, Microsoft announced a $22 billion contract with the US military… and Pelosi made an enormous profit.
It must have been a crazy coincidence.
Similarly, he loaded up on more high-risk call options of various semiconductor stocks in 2022, shortly before Congress announced the CHIPs Act (which poured billions of taxpayer subsidies into those same companies.) The companies’ stock prices soared, and Pelosi made a ton of money.
Another crazy coincidence for sure.
Just recently, Paul Pelosi decided to sell about $500,000 worth of Visa stock. And wouldn’t you know it— this week the Justice Department announced an antitrust lawsuit against Visa for illegally monopolizing the debit card market.
Visa’s stock price tumbled. But hey, Paul Pelosi had already sold. Incredible timing on his part… which, once again, must be a total coincidence.
Apparently everyone in the Washington establishment believes this to be true, because there has never been any serious investigation into the Pelosi’s potential impropriety. And if anyone so much as suggests that Pelosi has used her position for personal gain, it’s immediately labeled as “disinformation” or “misinformation.
New York City Mayor Eric Adams probably wishes for the same special treatment. Yet Adams was indicted this week on corruption charges for using his office for personal gain. I read the 57-page indictment, and the evidence against him is strong.
But the evidence against Pelosi is also strong. As is the evidence against “the Big Guy” profiting from Hunter Biden’s deals in Ukraine.
All of these people have long histories of improperly benefiting from their offices. And they’re all wrong. All of them. Yet only Eric Adams has been charged… which is pretty ironic for a party that claims to champion anti-racism.
They’re sending the black dude to jail while the old white people get to continue ripping off the public. Eric Adams is a criminal. But Paul Pelosi is the greatest investor of all time.
Just like Scientific American, the double standard is completely lost on them.
